Settled Science? Alarmist global warming models highly suspect

A new paper published in Science finds “the radiative forcing (that is, the perturbation to Earth’s energy budget) caused by human activities is highly uncertain, making it difficult to predict the extent of global warming,” and calling into question global warming models.

One of several reasons for this high uncertainty of the claims of the anthropogenic global warning alarmists is the complexity of determining the cooling effects of aerosols, which reflect sunlight back to space, and can also seed cloud formation.

According to the authors, “Aerosols counteract part of the warming effects of greenhouse gases, mostly by increasing the amount of sunlight reflected back to space. However, the ways in which aerosols affect climate through their interaction with clouds are complex and incompletely captured by climate models.”

“Recent advances have led to a more detailed understanding of aerosol-cloud interactions and their effects on climate, but further progress is hampered by limited observational capabilities and coarse-resolution climate models.”

The huge uncertainties with respect to cloudsaerosolssolar amplification mechanismsocean oscillations, and natural variability all make a mockery of the IPCC claim of increased confidence as its climate models increasingly diverge from temperature observations.

~ Posted originally at the Hockey Schtick

Print Friendly